The Register rips apart Orkut's Terms of Service. Of course, Xeni picked it up first.
Can you trust Google's Friendster clone Orkut? The search engine behemoth certainly has ambitious plans for your innocent musings. And be careful about any business ideas you express there.
The privacy policy, which fades beautifully into view, looks innocent enough. But Orkut's terms of service harbor a nasty payload -
"By submitting, posting or displaying any Materials on or through the orkut.com service, you automatically grant to us a worldwide, non-exclusive, sublicenseable, transferable, royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right to copy, distribute, create derivative works of, publicly perform and display such Materials."








1. Because of the huge number of stupid intellectual property lawsuits that have been won, IP lawyers for companies offering services that host content seem to ask, by default, for ridiculously broad rights to protect themselves. What they should be saying is, instead, that as long as you're a member, you grant them the right to display material that you've uploaded and that you warrant you have the rights to display, and that as soon as you cancel membership or remove files, that those rights end. That is just as legal, just as binding, and protects their rights just as much. But it's not all inclusive, and that's how IP lawyers think they're protecting the client. Orkut needs to ask their lawyers to think about the members of the service being their clients as much as orkut.
Posted at 4:38AM on Dec 19th 2005 by Glenn Fleishman